Posts Tagged ‘controversial’

BPA From Dental Sealants, Fillings: Is It Safe?

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

BPA leaches from dental sealants and “white” non-amalgam fillings — but dentists can take simple steps that greatly decrease risk from the controversial plastics ingredient.

Original post:
BPA From Dental Sealants, Fillings: Is It Safe?
Iluvnutrition

Fillings, Sealants May Leach BPA Into Kids’ Mouths (HealthDay)

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

HealthDay – TUESDAY, Sept. 7 (HealthDay News) — The fillings and sealants that many dentists use can expose children to the controversial chemical bisphenol A (BPA), a new analysis indicates, but such exposure is short-lived and it remains unclear whether or not it poses a long-term health risk.

More here:
Fillings, Sealants May Leach BPA Into Kids’ Mouths
(HealthDay)

Iluvnutrition

Pete Rose: I Was Never A Gambling Addict

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

Pete Rose sat down with Graham Bensinger for an interview on Monday, and the controversial star discussed gambling on baseball, his possible reinstatement and more. When asked if he thought he was a gambling addict, he quickly shot down the thought and said he was not. “I don’t think I was an addict. I think I could control what I was doing,” said the all-time hits leader . “I just was wrong and I got caught.” Read More… More on MLB

Read more here:
Pete Rose: I Was Never A Gambling Addict
Iluvnutrition

Study: BPA Linked to Higher Testosterone Levels

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Men who are exposed to high levels of the controversial plastic chemical bisphenol A (BPA) may show a small, but significant increase in blood levels of the male sex hormone testosterone, a study shows.

Read this article:
Study: BPA Linked to Higher Testosterone Levels
Iluvnutrition

Geoffrey Dunn: John McCain Still Pallin’ Around with Lobbyists

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

There is an air of both tragedy and farce as the Arizona Republican primary for the United States Senate comes to a conclusion this Tuesday. Incumbent John McCain–a venerated war hero and once celebrated presidential candidate–has been forced into the sludge against an unworthy opponent, J.D. Hayworth, in what is likely to be the final campaign of his political career. McCain has sullied his carefully crafted legacy by swinging sharply to the political right, betraying his once hard-forged positions on everything from immigration reform to global warming. In many respects, the McCain image as a “maverick” and “reformer” has always been something of a charade. McCain’s seminal role in the Keating Five scandal during his first term in office forever tarnished his reputation. Indeed, there are many who would argue that what we are now seeing is the real McCain–stripped bare of the fanciful narrative–whose guiding light is neither public virtue nor principle, but raw ambition and a lust for power. “There are two John McCains,” a close friend of the senator’s told New York Magazine’s Joe Hagan. “The one I love is a very big man, and he’s willing to take on big issues in a big way. Then there’s another side of John, he’ll admit, that is petty and angry and petulant and small, and that side has overtaken the other one.” For all his proclamations about congressional earmarks and fiscal transparency in the federal budget, McCain has always run with a close coterie of DC-based lobbyists, particularly during the campaign season, when his political ambitions merge with those of special interest groups who have poured money into his campaign coffers. Indeed, during McCain’s ill-fated run for the presidency in 2008, McCain’s proximity to lobbyists became the driving counter-narrative of the campaign. At the center of McCain’s lobbying controversies has been uber-lobbyist Rick Davis, his on-and-off-again presidential campaign manager who, according to Hagan, has sold what was left of McCain’s soul to the devil this summer in the blistering Arizona desert. Davis has long been a shady and controversial figure around McCain. A University of Alabama drop-out and former political operative in the Reagan White House, Davis worked his way into McCain’s inner-circle in the late 1990s by forging a relationship with McCain’s wife, Cindy, who once described Davis to Katie Couric as “our closest friend.” During the 2008 campaign, it was Davis–who after being demoted for a second time by McCain–was assigned the task of overseeing the selection process of the senator’s running mate, a process which he bungled badly. Not only did he fail to lay the political groundwork for McCain’s first choice of Joe Liebermann, he also oversaw the last-minute and haphazard vetting process that resulted in the erratic and self-serving Sarah Palin joining McCain on the GOP ticket. For that alone, Davis has earned a permanent asterisk in the annals of American political history. Davis himself was the focus several negative stories directed at the McCain campaign. First there were the revelations that Davis had worked for the Russian aluminum magnate Oleg Deripaska and had set up a meeting in Switzerland with McCain and Deripaska, whose “suspected links to anti-democratic and organized-crime figures are so controversial,” the Washington Post reported, “that the U.S. government revoked his visa.” Then came the revelations that Davis’s lobbying firm was paid nearly $2 million by Freddie Mac–the controversial federal mortgage giant that was placed in receivership during the middle of the 2008 presidential campaign. Davis and McCain were also linked to gambling interests in a celebrated New York Times expose that featured an account of McCain tossing $100 chips at a craps table in a Connecticut casino with Davis at his side–this at a time when McCain was regulating the operation of Indian casinos as a member of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. Less well known was what one senior McCain advisor called a “kickback scheme” orchestrated by Davis to skim five percent of all expenditures from the McCain campaign into a partnership, Management Alliance Realty, Inc., created by Davis’s friend and lobbyist Scott Reed and Reed’s controversial client, Indian-casino developer and lobbyist Richard Fields. According to the Wall Street Journal , Davis also formed a company ( 3eDC ) overseeing McCain’s internet campaign contributions for which he initially charged the campaign more than $1 million. For all the controversies, Davis is once again riding shotgun with McCain in Arizona, serving with another controversial lobbyist, Charlie Black , as senior advisors to the campaign. It has been based on Davis’s advice, according to Hagan –with apparently little regard for public perception of McCain’s integrity–that McCain has denied his “maverick” legacy and is sounding more and more like the right-wing Republicans with whom he once waged battle. That McCain will win his war against Hayworth on Tuesday goes without saying. The sad truth of the matter is that having his lobbyist pals at his side probably hasn’t hurt him. He has raised nearly $20 million to Hayworth’s $2.5 million. He may have once branded himself a political reformer, but with John McCain, the democratic process has always come with a price attached. Award-winning writer and filmmaker Geoffrey Dunn’s book The Lies of Sarah Palin: The Untold Story Behind Her Relentless Quest for Power will be published by St. Martin’s Press. More on Sarah Palin

Originally posted here:
Geoffrey Dunn: John McCain Still Pallin’ Around with Lobbyists

France begins controversial Roma expulsion – CNN

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

Telegraph.co.uk France begins controversial Roma expulsion CNN By the CNN Wire Staff People belonging to the Roma community wait to board a flight at Lyon airport on Thursday. Paris, France (CNN) — France was beginning the controversial expulsion of Roma on Thursday, putting 79 of them on a charter flight out of … France to repatriate 93 Gypsies to Romania The Associated Press France To Deport Roma From Illegal Camps Sky News France to begin Roma deportations BBC News AFP

Stewart RIPS Fox News For Contradictory Statements On Ground Zero Mosque (VIDEO)

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

Jon Stewart has really been on his game lately when it comes to showing FOX News pundits contradicting themselves. Last night on “The Daily Show,” Stewart again directed his attention to the debate over the Ground Zero mosque, beginning by highlighting the contradictory remarks President Obama made last week before moving on to FOX, hitting Glenn Beck particularly hard. One clip showed FOX News pundits claiming the location of the mosque isn’t their biggest concern, but the man spearheading the project Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, claiming “we don’t know what he’s planning to do in that cultural center.” Stewart didn’t hesitate to show a clip immediately afterwords of Rauf HIMSELF sitting on the FOX News couch talking about exactly that. But the best part of the segment was when Stewart caught Glenn Beck in a huge contradiction. The first clip showed Beck doubting Rauf’s “moderate” stance due to statements he made after 9/11 saying America didn’t “deserve” the attacks, but that American policies were “accessories to the crime.” “What kind of scheming, America-hating, extremist monster would say something so evil?” Stewart asked, before cutting to a clip of Beck saying LITERALLY the same thing as Rauf, just three months earlier. “What will he think tomorrow?” Stewart then turned to John Oliver to get his take on the controversial construction. Oliver pointed out that it’s not a question of “right” or “wrong,” but of “can” and “should.” For example, “You can build a Catholic church next to a playground, but should you?” WATCH:

View post:
Stewart RIPS Fox News For Contradictory Statements On Ground Zero Mosque (VIDEO)
Iluvnutrition

Frank Schaeffer: At Last Book That Asks: What Would Jesus Do About "Illegal" Immigrants?

Monday, August 16th, 2010

I remember the old days — now more than forty years ago — when I did a lot of hitchhiking all over the world. Sometimes after a very long wait I was almost annoyed with the kind person who finally stopped to pick me up. “Where the hell have you been?” I illogically was about to ask when I clambered into the “Good Samaritan” of the moment’s car. I feel the same way about Neighbor: Christian Encounters With ‘Illegal’ Immigration by Ben Daniels. It’s about time! Daniels strikes a blow to reclaim the actual Christian witness on the subject of welcoming the proverbial stranger into our midst. This witness has of late been buried under an avalanche of hatred projected at “the other” by too many people — usually white “conservative” Americans claiming that they are also Christians. For the last two years Daniels spent time thinking about immigration. He’s traveled to the border, spoken with and interviewed scores of people, including many undocumented migrants, and now he’s written a book about what he learned. (The book has just been published by Westminster John Knox Press). To the “church” following the gospel of hate — that is rapidly replacing the gospel of Jesus in “conservative” American political circles — Daniels’ book should come as a wakeup call. Lots of conservatives say they believe in Judgment Day. If so let this book be a warning. We have a choice: follow the compassionate moral leader all call Christ and that we Christians call the Son of God, or follow the anti-immigrant lynch mob as they try to not just slam our borders shut or even — in some circles — revoke the 14th Amendment so that the babies born to the “wrong” (read brown and black) sort of people can no longer become citizens. In the case of “illegal” immigrants Daniels literally asks us: what would Jesus do? I wrote the forward to his book because I believe — strike that I KNOW — Daniels got the answer right. Using a blend of travel narrative, interviews and biblical scholarship, Daniel tackles the controversial issues that surround undocumented migration in the United States by taking the reader to the spiritual, legal, and geographical front lines of the immigration debate. The political becomes personal. The result of this journey is the best book (so far) that encourages actual Christians and anyone else with a heart, to meet undocumented migrants as neighbors and as friends. (Study questions are included.) I care about America and (as a Christian) I also care about Jesus’ reputation. So I hope for all our sakes (both morally- and economically- speaking) that this book becomes a best seller. The anti-immigrant folks aren’t just wrong morally, they are wrong factually: we NEED young workers to offset our aging population. We are so very lucky so many people want to come here to better their lives! Read this book and then help save the future of this country by spreading the word! Frank Schaeffer is a writer and author of Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back More on Christianity

More:
Frank Schaeffer: At Last Book That Asks: What Would Jesus Do About "Illegal" Immigrants?
Iluvnutrition

Reid against plan to build mosque near ground zero

Monday, August 16th, 2010

By PHILIP ELLIOTT 2010-08-16T22:20:45Z WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate’s top Democrat on Monday came out against plans to build a mosque near the site of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, moving away from President Barack Obama on the controversial election-year issue….

Go here to read the rest:
Reid against plan to build mosque near ground zero
Iluvnutrition

Cenk Uygur: Rep. Rogers: We Should Have Considered Executing Daniel Ellsberg

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

We had Congressman Mike Rogers on MSNBC today regarding his controversial comments calling for capital punishment of Pvt. Manning, who is charged with releasing classified information to Wikileaks. Rep. Rogers was very clear and re-iterated his call for execution of Bradley Manning if he is convicted of the charges because he believes they are tanamount to treason. But he went further when I asked him what he would have done with Daniel Ellsberg who leaked the Pentagon Papers. He said he wasn’t clear on the facts of that case, but if Ellsberg had released information that put soldiers in the field at risk that he would have “absolutely” callled for his execution. I don’t think even Nixon went that far. I’ve actually said before that I understand why the military has to arrest and punish leakers like Pvt. Manning. As much as those leaks added clarity to the kind of wars we’ve conducted in Iraq and Afghanistan, I can understand why the military can’t have privates making that decision on their own. However, I do think there is an option between not doing anything and executing him. And what would happen if we held other leakers like Scooter Libby, Bob Novak and Karl Rove to Congressman Rogers’ standard? Eventually, all three admitted that they released the name of a secret operative to the press when they outed Valerie Plame (they claimed they didn’t know how secret her role was and eventually there was no trial on the substance because Scooter Libby obstructed the investigation — and was convicted for doing so). Leaking her identity could have gotten her and her contacts in the field killed. Should Libby, Novak and Rove been tried for treason and executed? Finally, it also seems pretty clear that someone close to Gen. McChrystal leaked his plan for Afghanistan before President Obama made his decision on escalation (this was before the on-the-record interviews with Rolling Stone ). Should we find who that guy is and hang him, too? What if it was Gen. McChrystal himself? And how come Republicans weren’t calling for executions during all of those leaks? It turns out that things get pretty messy once you start calling for executions. Let’s take a deep breath and figure out what the real solution is to a whistleblower that reveals important information that the public has a right to know but violates clear military rules to do so. That’s a complicated question and one that doesn’t get solved by killing anyone. Watch The Young Turks Here More on Iraq

Here is the original post:
Cenk Uygur: Rep. Rogers: We Should Have Considered Executing Daniel Ellsberg