Posts Tagged ‘safety’

Edwin D. Hill: Union Members to Palin: Where Do You Stand?

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

In an attempt to rally rank-and-file union members behind the Republican Party in advance of November’s midterm elections, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin recently took to the Internet to appeal to union members to oppose President Obama and congressional Democrats. To my hardworking, patriotic brothers and sisters in the labor movement: you don’t have to put up with the scare tactics and the big government agenda of the union bosses. There is a different home for you: the commonsense conservative movement. She even cited her and husband’s former membership in my union, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. Now former sister Palin is more than welcome to try to sell the GOP’s agenda to our membership — we count Democrats, Republicans and independents among our ranks. But let me offer her a piece of sales advice. If there is something our members hate — and we’ve done polling on this — its overheated rhetoric and knee-jerk partisanship. They value their vote and want to know where candidates stand on the issues that matter the most to them, their families and communities — not just to folks like me in Washington. This year it’s all about jobs, jobs, jobs. If Gov. Palin expects to get union members to support her endorsed candidates — and our locals have been more than willing to endorse GOP candidates if they are better on our issues — we need to see the details. But besides denouncing the Employee Free Choice Act — the bill that would remove many of the existing obstacles to workers exercising their right to join a union — and Obama’s rescue of the auto industry, which saved thousands of jobs, there isn’t much else in her appeal that tells us what she and her friends would do to help “good blue-collar Americans” if they took power. So in the interest of clarity, I hope Gov. Palin tells us more about where her “commonsense cause” stands on the following issues: Made in America: American manufacturing once dominated the world economy. Now, you’re lucky to find a Stars and Stripes made in the U.S.A. This nation has already lost one-third of its manufacturing output. And from Ohio to North Carolina, that has meant millions of lost jobs — jobs that once brought middle-class prosperity to communities across the country. “The good blue collar Americans” Gov. Palin speaks of want our lawmakers to get serious about making things here at home again. We need real incentives for corporations to build and hire in the U.S.A. We need Congress to stop passing lousy trade deals and to get serious about cracking down on Chinese currency manipulation, which amounts to an unfair global advantage. Where does she stand on the “Make it in America” agenda being promoted in Congress? The plan would eliminate tax-breaks for companies that offshore jobs and promote investments in new technologies that would enhance manufacturing here at home. One of Gov. Palin’s endorsed candidates, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) has voted for nearly every job killing trade deal that has come before her since she was elected, while voting against expanding the Trade Adjustment Assistance program, the federal lifeline for workers who have lost their jobs to global competition. And let’s not forget Palin-endorsed California senatorial candidate Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett-Packard chief executive (best known for giving more than 30,000 workers the pink slip), who in 2004 told a group of Silicon Valley executives that “there is no job that is America’s God-given right anymore.” After Fiorina speech in 2004, Sidney Weintraub, a political economist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told the San Francisco Chronicle : “Labor unions have battled ‘offshoring,’ which Fiorina calls ‘right- shoring.’” How does that fit in with Gov. Palin’s call for “creating good jobs with good wages?” Safety on the Job: As a wife of a former oil field worker, Gov. Palin surely knows the safety concerns that plague so many working families each day. Our members and their families want to know that their safety isn’t taken for granted. But we can’t always count on the goodwill of employers, as we saw from the mine tragedy in West Virginia last spring. We need to make sure the government is doing its job of upholding basic safety standards in the workplace. So how could Gov. Palin endorse someone like Rand Paul in Kentucky, who recently said mine safety regulations are unnecessary? Equal Pay for Equal Work: I’m sure Sarah Palin wouldn’t have put up with being paid less than her male co-workers. So why did she dump $5,000 on Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley’s re-election campaign? Isn’t she aware that he was one of the leading opponents of the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which was signed into law by Obama in 2009? The law reversed a Supreme Court ruling that prevented Ledbetter, a Goodyear Tire employee with nearly 20 years on the job, from suing for back pay after discovering she had been paid less that her male co-workers for doing the same job for years. Disgracefully, only five GOP senators voted for the bill — one of them being Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who just lost her GOP primary. No word on how her victorious opponent Joe Miller — another Palin friend — would have voted on it, but it’s something many real IBEW sisters would like to know. The people that Sarah Palin once called brothers and sisters and shared union membership with would like to get some serious answers.

Continued here:
Edwin D. Hill: Union Members to Palin: Where Do You Stand?
Iluvnutrition

Dan Onorato: Tom Corbett and the Marcellus Shale

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

Tom Corbett bows to the pressure of corporations and ignores the needs of the citizens of Pennsylvania. He has made clear that he will do nothing to protect the safety of Pennsylvanians and our environment. Read More…

Continued here:
Dan Onorato: Tom Corbett and the Marcellus Shale
Iluvnutrition

Melissa Petro: Thoughts From a Former Craigslist Sex Worker

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

People — not just prostitutes — have sex for many reasons. Sometimes, for some of us, one reason is money. From October to January 2007 I accepted money in exchange for sexual services I provided to men I met online in what was then called the “erotic services” section of Craigslist.org. No more a “professional” than a person renting a room on the same site is necessarily a professional real estate broker, for me and other women and men like myself, Craigslist at that time provided a simple, familiar forum through which I could do my business with complete anonymity, from the safety and convenience of my own home. At Craigslist.org, I was able to bill myself as exactly what I was at the time : a graduate student, bored and curious, sexually uninhibited, looking to make a little money while having a little fun. I wrote my own ads, screened my own prospective dates, decided on my own what I would and would not do for money, and — best of all — I kept every penny I earned, all without the interference of an agency or other ubiquitous “middle man.” Ultimately, while my experience as a “non-pro” was not the “fun” I had come looking for — I found the lifestyle physically demanding, emotionally taxing and spiritually bankrupting, and so I made a decision to desist some months after I’d gotten started, exiting the industry just as freely as I’d entered — never have I felt it was the state’s obligation — nor its right, in fact — to protect me from the decisions I made. On Thursday, September 4th, cowing to ongoing criticism from attorney generals and advocacy groups, Craigslist shut down what had come to be called its “adult services” section, replacing the link with a black and white bar that reads “censored.” This, after years of Craigslist founder Craig Newmark fighting such pressure, is a disappointing display of him abandoning the very principles of freedom on which his site was founded and feels more a violation than ever I experienced on even my worst “dates.” Opponents to the “adult services” section claimed that its existence facilitated with greater ease the trafficking and exploitation of women and children, and while I do not doubt such exploitation exists, it is my supposition that most women who are found out by the authorities to sell sex would rather be labeled a “victim” (and so entitled to protection) than to be considered a criminal (to be prosecuted and exposed). For all the “victims” of the “adult services” section of Craigslist.org, I would venture there are a considerable number of individuals like myself — free thinking, entrepreneurial human beings with choices and responsibilities — whose real-life experiences, not to mention sources of income — are being stifled by our so-called advocates. It has been some years since the last time I met a stranger through Craigslist for reasons other than to buy or sell a piece of furniture. I hope to never again make the choice to trade sex for cash even as I risk my current job and social standing to speak out for an individual’s right to do so. The simple fact is that people do have sex for money — many different kinds of people for many different reasons, people as varied as those looking to buy concert tickets, sell a collectible or adopt a pet — and these people will continue to. Whether the choice to do so is being dignified and protected with its own forum or whether what was once that safe space remains appropriately labeled “censored,” that choice, without a court order one way or another, remains up to Newmark.

See the original post:
Melissa Petro: Thoughts From a Former Craigslist Sex Worker
Iluvnutrition

Jamie Court: Raising Hell, Not Money Is What The Middle Class Needs From American Labor

Sunday, September 5th, 2010

The problem with American politics is that there is too much focus on raising money and too little on raising hell. The Labor movement in America suffers from the safe fate. This labor day, let’s remember what works for the American middle class and the labor movement that’s supposed to represent it. Authentic campaigns that seize on strong public outrage and funnel that that anger towards a big target are what’s secured suffrage rights for women, the safety net, and a minimum wage. Raising money for politicians has pushed labor leaders from their perches and into jail. Read More…

Read more from the original source:
Jamie Court: Raising Hell, Not Money Is What The Middle Class Needs From American Labor
Iluvnutrition

Mike Elk: Nuclear Regulators Prohibit Honeywell to Resume Production at Facility With Locked-Out Workers

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

When I originally wrote about Honeywell CEO David Cote threatening the safety of a small town by bringing in under-trained “scabs” (replacement workers ) to run a uranium enrichment facility in Metropolis, IL, some contacted me saying they doubted the safety concerns I cited were as serious. The plant is currently being operated on a skeleton crew of managers and hired scabs who are indeed under-trained. The Metropolis facility is the only conversion facility in the world that can distill uranium. While the scab workers Honeywell brought in from Louisiana have worked in nuclear facilities, they haven’t worked on the process that converts uranium from the somewhat toxic UF4 solid state to the extraordinarily more lethal liquid UF6. For the process of converting uranium to UF6, Honeywell is hoping to use its managers who used to work on these processes years ago according to local workers. In addition to not having worked these jobs in years and, as a result, being generally unfamiliar with them, the managers are liable to be especially unprepared to deal with the conversion plant’s control system, which has been altered dramatically in the last few years claims union official John Paul Smith. Currently, the workers running the plant are unfamiliar with the system they are using and unfamiliar with the processes. This is a uranium enrichment facility from which even the slightest leak of UF6 could wipe out the entire town. For this reason, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has not allowed the plant to resume production of UF6 according to local community and union sources. Local community and union officials claim that Honeywell is currently using all the political connections it can to force the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to re-open it. Honeywell originally said they would start up production of the deadly UF6 on Wednesday, however, Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspectors would not allow it. The Nuclear Regulatory Inspectors informed local community and union officials that they would not allow it because on Aug. 25 a round of urine tests on workers showed an unusually high amount of uranium in workers’ urine. The workers were not permitted to return to working with the uranium. Neither the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or Honeywell could be reached for comment to confirm the claims of local community members and union officials. Since uranium sometimes builds up in the blood stream of workers working around it for years, the high levels of uranium in the workers’ urine was not, in itself, unusual. None of the workers who were tested, however, had ever been tested for high levels of uranium, which meant they had been contaminated with the uranium since the last round of testing earlier this summer. More shockingly, one of the inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had unusually high levels of uranium in his urine tests. According to union spokesman John Paul Smith, degrading safety under the leadership of Cote has been a top concern of workers over the last few years. Under the management of Cote, the TOP safety programs of union-management safety committee have been disbanded. Under the TOP system, each incident was investigated jointly by a full-time union representative and a full-time company representative, who each filed an independent report on the matter. Because the union’s workers would suffer the most from toxic uranium exposure, it had the biggest incentive to make sure the plant was safe, and thus, often wrote tougher reports than the company. For this reason TOP was disbanded. In place of TOP, Honeywell implemented its own program of behavioral safety, without the workers’ input. If there was a problem or a leak, a worker was deemed responsible and disciplined for that problem even if it occurred because of aging equipment. If a worker reported a problem in their section, he was often cited for misconduct and liable to be fired. One worker who reported a routine problem was fired after 30 years of experience and no prior record of safety violations according to sources familiar with the firing. The threat of firing workers for reporting safety problems actually creates a disincentive for workers to report problems. Workers claim that Cote is far more interested in keeping his record profits high than actually protecting workers and the surrounding community. During contract negotiations, Cote has proven this by risking nuclear fallout in order to demand that uranium workers agree to cut their retiree health care and pension plans. That is why today, the 350,000 members of the Steelworkers Organization of Active Retirees called on President Obama to fire Cote from the so-called Deficit Commission. They said: Mr. Cote’s cruel and calculated behavior towards workers at its hexafluoride plant in Metropolis, Ill. clearly illustrates that he’s unqualified and inappropriate to help decide issues such as whether to reduce the federal deficit by cutting programs like social security or by upgrading the faulty military contracting process, from which Honeywell benefits. Mr. Cote should be evicted from the so-called Deficit Commission immediately before he can use that position to harm all Americans the way he is injuring Honeywell workers in Illinois. Since Cote is one of President Obama’s personal appointments to the Deficit Commission, it falls upon the president to decide whether or not a man such as Cote should continue to serve on his commission.

Link:
Mike Elk: Nuclear Regulators Prohibit Honeywell to Resume Production at Facility With Locked-Out Workers
Iluvnutrition

Janet Napolitano: Improving America’s Disaster Response

Friday, August 27th, 2010

As we approach the fifth anniversary of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, it’s important to note how far our nation has come in improving our ability to respond to and recover from disasters and the progress we’ve made in helping our Gulf Coast recover from one of the worst natural disasters in our country’s history. Since taking office, the Obama administration has made Gulf Coast rebuilding a top priority. Over the past 20 months, we’ve obligated more than $2.5 billion in funding for new schools and universities, fire houses, police stations, and critical infrastructure, including roads, bridges, hospitals and public health assets across the Gulf. Earlier this week, we announced an additional $25 million in newly-approved funding for rebuilding projects in Louisiana and Mississippi, the latest in a series of Gulf Coast recovery projects. These resources are helping revitalize communities, cut through red tape, and get long-delayed construction projects off the ground. We’ve also made tremendous progress since Katrina and Rita in improving our country’s ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from major disasters of all kinds. An example of this progress is the recovery efforts this summer following the worst flooding in more than a century in Nashville, Tenn. These floods took the lives of more than 30 individuals, devastated communities, and threatened the safety and livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of residents. Despite this historic damage, our swift and effective response demonstrated what a difference preparation, coordination between federal, state, and local governments, and the quick deployment of resources to local communities can make. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), an agency within the Department of Homeland Security, played a key role in the government’s response. But as our FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate would be the first to say, preparing for — and responding to — disasters truly is a shared responsibility. While we continue to strengthen and streamline efforts to prepare for disasters at the federal level, citizens, families, communities, faith organizations, and businesses all have an important role to play in our collective response to emergencies. As we remember the tragic events along the Gulf Coast five years ago, please take a moment to visit ready.gov — learn how to prepare an emergency kit, develop a plan for reuniting with family members after a disaster, and ensure you have plans in place for caring for family and friends. As the residents of Nashville can attest, we’ve made tremendous progress since August 2005. Working together, we will continue building a stronger and more resilient nation than ever before. Janet Napolitano is Secretary of Homeland Security Read more from the Hurricane Katrina: 5 Years of Remembering & Rebuilding series.

See the original post:
Janet Napolitano: Improving America’s Disaster Response
Iluvnutrition

Dodd Questions Elizabeth Warren’s Management Experience — A Concern He’s Never Raised Before

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

In questioning Elizabeth Warren’s candidacy to lead a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd has repeatedly asked whether Warren possesses the appropriate management experience to lead a large federal bureaucracy. But it’s the first time Chairman Dodd has publicly raised such an issue when it came to evaluating presidential nominees to agency positions under the banking committee’s purview. A review of transcripts from past confirmation hearings shows that Dodd has never questioned the management experience of nominees to head federal agencies his committee oversees. The heads of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, the Export-Import Bank and the National Credit Union Administration all survived hearings under Dodd’s chairmanship without him once asking a question about the experience needed to guide their respective agencies. Nor did Dodd raise any management questions when prospective bank regulators came before his committee — even when the regulators did not have significant management experience. In the two years prior to his assuming the chairmanship in 2007, the heads of the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of Thrift Supervision, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and a prior chief of the SEC all came before his committee. Each time, Dodd declined to ask about their experience running bureaucracies, a review of transcripts shows. In fact, Dodd didn’t even show up for two of those hearings. When he did show up, and make statements or ask questions, Dodd largely praised the nominees — rather than engage in tough, critical questioning. When former OCC chief John C. Dugan came before the banking committee in July 2005, Dodd congratulated him on the nomination, then said he had “great confidence” that Dugan and the other prospective regulators before the committee would bring “great expertise, stability, and dignity” to their new posts. Dodd didn’t ask a question during the hearing for Dugan, or any of the other nominees (which included John M. Reich, who would oversee thrifts at the OTS, and Christopher Cox, who would lead the SEC). Dodd’s Democratic colleague, former committee chairman Paul S. Sarbanes of Maryland, grilled Reich on his agency’s staffing and its dependence on a single bank for a large portion of its budget. Sarbanes also critically questioned Dugan on the OCC’s practice of effectively nullifying tough state consumer protection laws through the practice of preemption. Reich resigned last year under pressure. His agency oversaw numerous banks that failed in part due to poor supervision, and the AIG unit that peddled credit default swaps, the explosion of which nearly brought down the nation’s financial system. Dugan recently stepped down at the end of his five-year term, his agency under fire for its lax protection of consumers. Cox’s SEC failed to catch Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme and oversaw highly over-leveraged investment firms like Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch — all of which either failed or were guided into government-backed mergers. “I have been a member of the U.S. Senate for some 28 years. I can count on one hand the number of nominees that I have opposed over that time of Republican and Democratic administrations,” Dodd said during an April 2009 confirmation hearing. “I do not believe it is a time for people to inject the opposition, their ideological framework. Presidents’ elections have meaning, and if a President gets elected, he or she deserves to have the teams in place to help them execute their policies and their promises to the American people.” Warren’s case is special, though. The Harvard Law professor and chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel, a bailout watchdog, could be asked to start an agency from scratch. The consumer regulator is an entirely new agency, and will undoubtedly face turf battles with regulators charged with ensuring the safety and soundness of the banking industry. High overdraft fees, for example, ensure comfortable profits, but consumer advocates call them abusive. The head of the consumer bureau would have to balance those competing concerns, as well as guide an agency with a budget of hundreds of millions of dollars. The first director will set the tone for the next several years, consumer advocates and banking industry experts say. However, Dodd’s open questioning of Warren’s qualifications for the job and her potential to be confirmed raises additional questions. For the past few weeks, in interviews with Bloomberg News, Dow Jones, TPMDC, the Hartford Courant and American Banker , among others, Dodd has consistently questioned Warren’s capacity to head the agency she largely conceived. “My simple question about Elizabeth is: Is she confirmable?” Dodd told the Courant in an interview this month. “It isn’t just a question of being a consumer advocate. I want to see that she can manage something, too.” During a July 26 news briefing White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Warren is “very confirmable.” Other White House spokespeople have repeated that claim. In an interview with American Banker , Dodd again raised the issue of management experience. “In the case of the consumer protection division you need to have someone who can manage and setup a good agency, and that requires a skill set to do it right,” Dodd said. But Dodd never raised similar questions when it came to bank regulators’ perceived lack of management experience. For instance, Dugan and Bair had top positions in the Treasury Department, but neither ran an organization on their own. Cox was an attorney and longtime member of Congress, but he, too, never oversaw a bureaucracy. Dodd didn’t speak on the record at Bair’s confirmation hearing, nor did he submit any written questions for the record, documents show. Dodd, through a spokesman, declined to comment for this article. The outgoing banking committee chairman, who is not seeking reelection this year, has said that he would support Warren were she to be nominated. The bailout watchdog and noted consumer advocate is among three candidates to lead the new consumer agency, according to the White House. The unit will be entrusted with protecting borrowers from abusive lenders. The agency will have wide authority to regulate consumer credit products like mortgages and credit cards. The other candidates are Michael Barr, a top lieutenant to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and Eugene Kimmelman, a top lawyer in the Justice Department. “If the president wants to name her and it goes through the hearing process, then fine, he’ll have my support,” Dodd told the Courant this month regarding Warren’s possible nomination. “But she has to tell me more than just she’s a good consumer advocate or that’s she’s got a great campaign.” ************************* Shahien Nasiripour is the business reporter for the Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail ; bookmark his page ; subscribe to his RSS feed ; follow him on Twitter ; friend him on Facebook ; become a fan ; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455. Read more: Elizabeth Warren , The Financial Fix , Financial Reform , Wall Street Reform , Cfpa , Christopher Dodd , Chris Dodd , Dodd-Frank Bill , Consumer Financial Protection Bureau , Consumer Financial Protection Agency , Cfpb , Financial Crisis , Consumer Protection , Financial Regulation , Business News

Link:
Dodd Questions Elizabeth Warren’s Management Experience — A Concern He’s Never Raised Before
Iluvnutrition

Peter Henne: Treading Water in Sri Lanka

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Last week, a commission began investigating the final phase of a horrendous decades-long civil war. This war, which ended last year, caused tens of thousands of deaths, prompted military interventions from a regional power, drew in a transnational diaspora, and spawned numerous refugees. The war’s aftermath presents significant implications for the international community concerning counterinsurgency, terrorism and refugee flows. Unfortunately, it occurred in Sri Lanka, a country that receives negligible, if any, attention in US media or political discussions. If the international community were to focus on this crisis, however, diplomatic pressure to address the grievances driving the conflict combined with reconstruction aid could yield tremendous benefits. Tensions between the majority Sinhalese and the minority Tamils in Sri Lanka began after independence from Great Britain. The colonial government empowered the Tamils at the expense of the Sinhalese, which generated a great amount of resentment. Contention between the groups erupted into a civil war in the 1980s that continued until recently; the primary combatant on the Tamil side was the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a terrorist group characterized by destructive attacks and a pioneering use of suicide bombings. Indian forces intervened in the late 1980s, but their troops did little to stabilize the country. After almost two decades of abortive peace agreements, Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa launched an all-out offensive against the LTTE, with Sri Lanka’s civilians caught in the middle. The turmoil continued after the war ended. President Rajapaksa easily won re-election in January 2010. Yet, his opponent — General Sarath Fonseka — was recently convicted by a military court, an event some see as politically-motivated; Rajapaksa also attacked the UN over its attempts to investigate government actions during the war and set up his own commission, which many believe will be inadequate. And Tamils have expressed concerns over continuing government activities in Tamil-populated areas and perceived threats to their demographic and cultural integrity. The situation in Sri Lanka resembles a swimmer treading water, neither sinking nor rising. There are several reasons why we should care about this, beyond altruistic concerns. First is what it says about counterinsurgency tactics. The Sri Lankan government defeated the LTTE through brute force, rather than a restrained civilian-centric strategy. This in part shows the inherent tragedy of war, as “good guys” are often hard to find and conflict rarely ends in a satisfying and morally-sound manner. As I have said before , this presents unwelcome lessons for US efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Namely, is it possible to put down an insurgency without resorting to the Sri Lankan government’s tactics? Is the best we can hope for a low-level equilibrium? These are questions, not answers. If international silence over the Sri Lankan civil war continues, this could indicate tacit agreement that the government’s rough tactics were acceptable, or at the least unavoidable. Second, the Sri Lanka crisis speaks to worries over both terrorism and refugees. While the worldwide Tamil diaspora for the most part rejected the LTTE’s brutal tactics, the group likely gained some support from Tamils abroad. Also, many Tamils fled the country during the fighting, including a ship-borne group that recently reached Canada. Canadian officials want to ensure the safety of the refugees, but also worry about terrorist entry into the country. International inaction could both allow LTTE cells to continue operation — possibly serving as a model for other transnational terrorist networks — and lead to the denial of asylum to legitimate refugees. This treading of water is also apparent in US attention to the crisis. President Obama called on the Sri Lankan government to protect its civilians in May of 2009, and a November 2009 Congressional resolution expressed similar concerns. But there has been little beyond that. With all the international and domestic problems we are facing, and a mid-term election looming, can we really expect US leaders to devote resources to this crisis? Probably not. That being said, of the various international concerns out there, this one may be relatively easy to address. Major combat is over, so it would not require military intervention in an ongoing war. And despite some problems, Sri Lanka is a democracy, so the United States would not be required to partner with a regime of dubious integrity. Diplomatic pressure and the threat of economic sanctions combined with aid for combat-affected areas could push the Sri Lankan government to accept the UN mission while providing help in recovering from the war. Achieving a just resolution to this war, and repairing war-ravaged areas of Sri Lanka, would help the Sri Lankan people and provide a beneficial model for other cases of conflict resolution. Inaction, however, will produce a perpetuation of the tragic status quo in which the international community looks on as untold numbers of civilians die. More on Sri Lanka

Read more:
Peter Henne: Treading Water in Sri Lanka
Iluvnutrition

Laura Dekker, Dutch Teen, Sets Sail In Secrecy On Solo Trip Around The World

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

PORTIMAO, Portugal — A 14-year-old Dutch sailor departed in secrecy from Portugal Saturday on her quest to become the youngest person to sail solo around the world, avoiding the media because her manager said she didn’t want the attention. Laura Dekker said goodbye to her father and friends at an undisclosed Portuguese port enroute to Spain’s Canary Islands or Portugal’s Madeira Island despite almost windless conditions in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Portugal, according to manager Peter Klarenbeek. Klarenbeek said the girl was in good spirits as she started sailing her 38-foot (11.5-meter) ship “Guppy” on a trip expected to last a year or more. The attempt has been criticized by Dutch child protection authorities who questioned the wisdom of a child risking the world’s oceans alone. “She said goodbye to her father and friends and she sailed away into the horizon,” Holland’s MasMedia company, which has exclusive TV rights to film her voyage, said in a statement. Laura had been scheduled to depart from Portimao, and photographers and television crews from around the world were at the resort in southwestern Portugal but ended up with no images of the departure. MasMedia is documenting the trip with remote cameras mounted on Laura’s yacht and offered to sell the footage to anyone who is interested starting on Sunday. The girl’s website features links titled “My Coordinates” and “Where is Laura,” but neither was working Saturday, and a porthole-shaped counter of the days of her voyage stood at zero. One of the voyage’s sponsors, Ferry Dammers, showed up in Portimao with a banner to display on her boat as it left – but he ended up hanging around with the media crowd and never got to mount his banner on the “Guppy.” “I am disappointed, I have the banner here but when I spoke to Klarenbeek he informed me Laura had already set off on her journey,” said Dammers, whose company supplied Laura with wax for the hull of her sailboat. A Dutch court last month released Laura from the guardianship of Dutch child protection agencies who had tried to block her voyage because of fears about her safety and psychological health. Marijke Schaaphok, Masmedia’s director, defended the girl’s push to sail around the world, saying Laura is mature for her age and has proven that she can sail her yacht without help from anyone else after passing a maritime exam in the Netherlands for a vessel of her boat’s size. She also insisted that Laura is uniquely qualified for the ambitious sea venture because she grew up with her father on a boat, and “is completely different from a normal 14-year-old girl.” Schaaphok said. “She’s very wise and a little bit impatient, but she’s a very nice girl and she knows exactly what she wants,” Schaaphok said. Laura’s first port of call will be picked based on wind conditions, and her departure came after she took numerous steps to reduce objections to the voyage – including the purchase of a bigger, sturdier boat than the one she originally planned to use, and courses in first aid and coping with sleep deprivation. She also used as evidence her successful solo trip across the North Sea to England. In the end, the Dutch court ruled that her preparations were adequate and it was up to her divorced parents to decide whether to let her make the attempt. The trip comes just two months after American Abby Sunderland, age 16, had to be rescued in a remote section of the Indian Ocean during an attempt to circle the globe. Earlier this year, Australian Jessica Watson, completed a 210-day voyage at age 16. But while Watson remained at sea nonstop, Laura plans to stop at dozens of ports and may even return home to catch up on her studies before resuming her trip. If Laura completes the voyage, any record she claims would be unofficial and likely to be challenged. The Guinness’ World Records and the World Sailing Speed Record Council have decided they will no longer recognize records for “youngest” sailors to avoid encouraging dangerous attempts. ___ Associated Press writers Alan Clendenning and Harold Heckle in Madrid and Mike Corder in The Hague, Netherlands, contributed to this report.

Read more:
Laura Dekker, Dutch Teen, Sets Sail In Secrecy On Solo Trip Around The World
Iluvnutrition

Jim Luce: Haitian-American Professionals Returning to Haiti to Help Post-Quake

Friday, August 20th, 2010

Haitian-Americans are becoming increasingly vital to the reconstruction of Haiti. I accompanied several back to their native land last week to work with orphans in the epicenter of the earthquake, Leogane. I travelled with Evens Anozine, Deborah Pierre, and Handal Murat on behalf of Orphans International Worldwide ( OIWW ). Our mission was multifold, including assessing progress with OIWW’s three primary programs: orphan care, educational support for orphans, and leadership training for orphan mentors. Haitian-American Evens Anozine of New York City is originally from Leogane. I have been aware of the tremendous role the Haitian Diaspora plays in keeping the people of Haiti alive, and the large number of bright and dedicated Haitian-American leaders. I met Katleen Felix years ago, and have witnessed her great work with the largest micro-finance institution in Haiti Fonkoze , as well as the relatively new Zafen . I turned to Katleen for her introduction to this topic. She told me from Port-au-Prince, by way of Montreal and Miami: The Haitian Diaspora has been sending remittances to support families and friends since the late 80′s when migration was more linked to economic reason. The money support is often for food, lodging, health, and school tuitions of the one left behind. There is no social security in Haiti – the Diaspora is the safety net of so many. After the earthquake, the first responders were Haitians from the Diaspora. In one month Fonkoze paid $7 million in transfers, helping people on the ground to get cash to eat, relocate, find lodging, etc… this was the Diaspora in full action. The danger is to get in a cycle of dependency where recipients who cannot find a job depend on the next transfer to get some food and take care of their basic needs. Some senders realized that if they don’t find a way to create a job or an opportunity for their loved ones, it will not be sustainable. Katleen Felix presenting at Seminaire CENAREF in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. The resources are limited in the Diaspora. Even with all the good intentions, some might not have the capacity to keep up with the increasing demand of cash without weakening their own finances. There is a need to create small businesses that can create livelihood. Some members of the Diaspora have decided to invest and come to Haiti to provide technical assistance to their family and friends in very informal ways. We have also collective remittances through Haitian Hometown Associations which are started by supporting humanitarian work such as helping an orphanage, a school, or at church. These associations are now investing in productive projects that are generating revenues for the communities. These efforts are a little bit more organized, but yet need training and support to grow the businesses. This is why we created Zafen – to showcase those types of effort, help them find funding, and have a bigger impact in their community. This is not only a fundraising tool but a program where business analysts will give them training and be an agent of change for those communities. We work closely with the Haitian Hometown Associations Resource Group to identify joint projects and communities that are trying to get out of the cycle of dependency and poverty. Katleen Felix of Fonkoze and Zafen frequently speaks to audiences around the world. The reality is that 80% of Haitian professionals have left Haiti over the years, leaving a hole in their hometown. Mechanisms to give back are needed for those professionals. It is not a donation from the host country – who benefit from those resources – to help the Diaspora organize, it is due to a Haiti that has been an international donor of brain for decades. Unfortunately, we don’t see a lot of international donors recruiting from the Haitian Diaspora or facilitating experts from the Diaspora to come back to help. The Ministry of Haitian Abroad is trying to put together a program to support the return or the contribution of Haitian experts from abroad. If this program happens, we will see a more organize contribution of the Diaspora in to the country. At the level of organizations like Fonkoze we need try to find resources within the Diaspora, sometimes we get lucky but not everybody is ready to move back or have enough country experience to take the job. The reverse migration is a nice concept but we need mechanisms to support the migrant it that journey. Haitian-American Evens Anozine of New York City wears several hats, representing Orphans International Worldwide, We Can’t Have That Foundation, and NYU Polytechnic’s GreenLight Innovations. Evens says: As a Haitian American it is imperative that we find ways to give back to Haiti. However, we must ensure that our effort is not in vain. All Haitian Americans, whether they were born in the U.S. or having been born in Haiti, have an affinity for our beloved island. The culture, the music, the people and the food – especially food like Duri ak Sauce Pwa , Lambi avek Griots! We now have to find ways to participate with the “development” of Haiti. All of us can make a difference. The Diaspora is a community that has yet to be tapped properly, approximately about four million Haitians are living outside of Haiti. Collectively, we send home over a billion dollars annually. I can remember, my Mom and Dad working two jobs not only take care of my two sisters and I but also to help family members back home. With no education, my parents sacrificed their lives to make sure that ours would be better. For many years, I only saw my father on Sundays. This is something you will find in every Haitian household. I believe parents have to encourage their children to find ways to help Haiti. Unfortunately there are many parents who discourage their young adults to travel to Haiti prior to the earthquake and even now. As a matter of fact, on our most recent trip to Haiti, we were supposed to be accompanied by a young Haitian doctor, but her family actively discouraged her from traveling, pointing out security reasons among many. With Wyclef Jean possibly running for president, I believe there will be renewed hope among Haitian Americans to travel home to help. I hope he has a clear concept as to how he will contribute to the country and help propel the Haitian people to a new way of life. His “TEAM” of leaders will also make a big difference. The people of Haiti need our help now, the work that all of us are doing across Haiti is of utmost need. What we do today, will resonate a thousand years from now. I truly believe that the future of Haiti is in our hands. Deborah Pierre assisted OIWW in leogane match orphans with mentors for OIWW. Deborah Pierre, a Haitian-American artist representative also living in New York but originally from Port-au-Prince, told me on the trip and expounded on at the Gramercy Park Hotel’s roof-top bar a week later: I adopted two kids through my aunt who live in Haiti years ago. Two little girls who are 7 and 16 years old. They have had tragic lives. Their mother was going to commit suicide and then gave up her daughters. Haiti is part of me. It is my country. I don’t feel privileged to help, I feel it is my duty. Living in New York City is not easy, but if I can live in New York and give back to Haiti it feels ideal for me. What I care about most is Haiti’s kids – they are our future. I feel that if we can help them as Haitian-Americans we are ensuring that we will have a better nation down the road. I love Haiti and her children and want to play a role in the creation of a New Haiti. Like most Haitian-Americans, Handal Murat is bi-cultural and tri-lingual – and loves kids. Handal Murat, a medical supplies specialist from Connecticut, grew up in Petionville outside Port-au-Prince. He explained why he went on the trip: Having witnessed the international community’s immediate and overwhelming response to our country in its desperate time of need; I felt as a native Haitian living abroad the obligation to roll up my sleeves and also help. Not going to volunteer was never an option for me. It was more a matter of when. While I know that many Haitians living abroad can’t physically make the trip, I encourage them to help by supporting local fundraisings, supply drives, and even sponsoring an orphaned child. The news media has left Haiti and the rest of the world will inevitably go back to their lives. Haitians in the Diaspora play a vital role in rebuilding Haiti because of our deep and lasting ties to our beloved country. Many of us still have cousins, aunts and other extended family members living there. I gained more from the trip than I gave. The resilience and hope of the people is contagious. After touring the destruction in Port-au-Prince and Leogane, walking through the tent cities and interviewing many of the orphans, I returned home with a totally new perspective of what’s really important. For Haitian-Americans, just like it is for all of us, the motivation comes from seeing the results. The programs Orphans International Worldwide runs in Leogane include family care for orphaned children academic scholarships for orphaned students not in family care, and a college leadership mentoring program. There are approximately 100 students in each program, each of whom can be sponsored on-line . Family care children are $50 per month, academic tuition is $25 per month, and orphan mentor support is $10 per month. It seems obvious to this non-Haitian writer that the New Haiti, rising from the ashes of the earthquake, will succeed only with the full support of the Diaspora. Haitian-Americans are called to embrace their moral and social obligations. And they are doing so. Related Stories by Jim Luce : Trip to Haiti #22: Some Changes at Bottom, Same Old Stuff at Top Jim Luce on Haiti (The Stewardship Report) Jim Luce on Orphans International Worldwide (The Stewardship Report) Zafen: New Interest-Free Microloan Initiative Launched for Haiti Airplane Interview with the American Ambassador to Haiti Fonkoze Helps Rebuild Haiti through Microfinance Following Earthquake More on Haiti Earthquake

More:
Jim Luce: Haitian-American Professionals Returning to Haiti to Help Post-Quake
Iluvnutrition